Home
 

Have you ever walked south on 16th Street on the right hand side across U Street? You have a light there, but then you have to cross New Hampshire with a crosswalk and no light.

View Larger Map

The wife and I do it just about every day on the way to work. It's not a problem to cross U Street, but crossing New Hampshire is a little dicey. Almost every day, someone assumes that, because they aren't turning at a 90 degree angle, they don't have to yield to pedestrians. Twice in the last month or so, we've had a car actually slow down or pull over to yell at us for getting in the way.

This is all while walking in a crosswalk, by the way. The wife, being more confrontational than I, has exchanged words with some of these drivers.

I emailed Jim Graham yesterday, and he has tasked a staff member with looking into it. I want them to put up a sign reminding people that they have to yield. I know it's a funny intersection, but it's an area with a lot of foot traffic, and it's dangerous. It doesn't help that many pedestrians will yield their right of way to cars.

I understand the reasoning there - if you get hit by a car, your broken bones and whatnot don't really care about the stand you were making for pedestrian's rights. However, when you give up your right of way, you are also taking mine, because now the drivers think they're right.

So stand up for your right of way. And if you've ever had this trouble at this intersection, or any other, write to your councilmember. I don't actually know who's in charge of that area - Ward 1 and Jim Graham's turf ends just north of there at Florida Avenue. But your councilmember would no doubt be aware of who needs to be notified.

I'll keep you posted on what he intends to do about it.

Posted in

A better solution is to put

A better solution is to put a walk/don't walk signal on the crosswalk across New Hampshire at that point, so that pedestrians can cross New Hampshire safely when the light is green for traffic on U Street.

There are too many crosswalks in DC across busy streets without lights for pedestrians to use. It's just plain dangerous for everyone for pedestrians to have the right to walk across traffic just because there's a crosswalk. Put lights in.

I think you'd still need a

I think you'd still need a sign - drivers treat it as going straight, and assume they have the right of way. Most drivers wouldn't notice a walk signal.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Merchandise
Support This Site

Nano
  • Nanowrimo 2007 Winner
  • Nanowrimo 2006 Winner
  • Nanowrimo 2005 Winner
  • Nanowrimo 2003 Winner
  • Nanowrimo 2002 Winner

Other